Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Granted N50m Bail as Court Rejects FG’s Push for Remand in Defamation Case
In a dramatic turn of events at the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in Maitama, Abuja, Justice Chizoba Orji refused the federal government’s application to detain Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, instead granting her bail to the tune of ₦50 million.
A Political Case in Disguise?
Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan, who represents Kogi Central, is facing a three-count charge bordering on criminal defamation, in a case filed by the federal government but driven by two politically exposed figures: Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello. Both are listed as nominal complainants.
The charges, filed on May 16, 2025, accuse her of making “harmful imputations” likely to damage the reputation of Akpabio and Bello a claim that includes a televised allegation that the two conspired to assassinate her.
Yet, many observers see the trial as more than just a legal matter it’s increasingly viewed as part of a broader power struggle within Nigeria’s political elite, particularly targeting a vocal and unrelenting female senator challenging the status quo.
Judge Rejects Detention Plea, Cites Senator’s Willingness to Face Trial
In her ruling, Justice Orji dismissed the government’s request to remand the senator in prison, stating there was “no sufficient justification” to deny her bail. The court acknowledged Akpoti-Uduaghan’s consistent presence and cooperation since the case began.
As part of her bail conditions, she must provide one surety who owns property within Abuja and is deemed a person of “high integrity.”
Support and Symbolism
The courtroom on Thursday wasn’t just a legal venue it became a symbol of solidarity. Akpoti-Uduaghan was accompanied by her husband, Emmanuel Uduaghan, former Education Minister Oby Ezekwesili, and renowned activist Aisha Yesufu powerful symbols of support from civil society and women’s rights advocates.
Their presence underscores the belief that this trial is not just about defamation, but a battle for free speech, accountability, and political independence in Nigeria’s legislative space.
Background: Political Fallout and Suspension
This legal battle stems from a simmering clash between Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Senate leadership. In March, she was suspended from the red chamber for “gross misconduct” a decision she and many critics have labeled a retaliatory move for speaking out against alleged harassment by Akpabio.
Following her suspension, Akpoti-Uduaghan didn’t retreat. She launched a public campaign, filed petitions, and made grave accusations including an alleged assassination plot. These actions prompted Akpabio and Bello to petition the Inspector-General of Police, demanding criminal prosecution for defamation and “conduct likely to cause a breach of peace.”
Former Governor Bello, who is also facing a separate cloud of legal controversies, claims the senator falsely accused him of orchestrating efforts to recall her from office.
A Chilling Message to Critics?
The timing and force of the charges raise serious concerns. Critics argue that this case is part of a disturbing trend where opposition voices, whistleblowers, and reform-minded legislators are targeted with criminal charges meant to silence and intimidate.
At the heart of this case lies a crucial question: Is this truly about defamation, or is it about silencing a woman who refuses to back down from political confrontation?
What’s Next
With bail granted, the trial is scheduled to resume on September 23, 2025. Between now and then, Nigerians and the world will be watching to see whether this case will be a test of the judiciary’s independence or another low point in Nigeria’s political culture of weaponized prosecution.
Reference
Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Granted N50m Bail as Court Rejects FG’s Push for Remand in Defamation Case