UN Approves $5.4 Billion Peacekeeping Budget Amid Cash Crisis and Global Uncertainty
In a move that underscores both commitment and crisis, the United Nations General Assembly has approved a $5.38 billion peacekeeping budget for the 2025–2026 fiscal year a slight reduction from the previous year’s $5.59 billion.
The decision follows weeks of tense negotiations, with diplomats navigating not only mission costs but also rising concerns over the UN’s deepening liquidity crunch.
The budget, recommended by the Fifth Committee (Administrative and Budgetary), covers 12 active missions, two logistics hubs in Entebbe (Uganda) and Brindisi (Italy), and the support account for operations. Despite fiscal strain, delegates managed to pass the allocations largely without a vote a sign of fragile consensus amid global tensions.
UNIFIL Vote Sparks Diplomatic Rift
While most mission budgets passed smoothly, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was an exception. The vote passed with 147 in favor, 3 against (Israel, the U.S., and Argentina), and 1 abstention (Paraguay). The result came after a controversial Israeli-sponsored amendment was overwhelmingly rejected by 83 countries, signaling growing unease about geopolitical pressure on peacekeeping operations.
This diplomatic tug-of-war reveals how global fault lines increasingly shape decisions at the UN, especially on issues involving Middle East security.
Budget Approved, But Money Missing
Even as the Assembly approved the budget, the UN’s top financial officer painted a bleak picture of the organization’s financial health.
“No money, no implementation,” warned UN Controller Chandramouli Ramanathan. “We are approving budgets without guaranteeing the cash to back them.”
Ramanathan criticized the recurring pattern where missions are funded on paper but left scrambling for liquidity, leading to emergency cuts of 10–20% across operations. He called on member states to address the systemic cash flow failures that have plagued the organization for decades.
“I only wish you had gone a little further to solve one of the UN’s deepest problems. This issue has haunted us for 80 years,” he told delegates at the closing session.
Peacekeeping Under Pressure
Peacekeeping remains one of the UN’s most visible and vital roles. With nearly 70,000 personnel deployed globally, operations like MONUSCO in the Democratic Republic of Congo, UNFICYP in Cyprus, and MINUSCA in the Central African Republic are on the frontlines of conflict resolution.
From protecting civilians to assisting post-conflict governance and disarmament, these missions operate in high-risk environments often with shrinking resources and unclear exit strategies.
The current budget reflects not only the settlement of former missions in Côte d’Ivoire and Liberia, but also growing demands for strategic reform. Critics argue that without predictable and transparent funding, the UN risks turning its peacekeeping missions into symbolic gestures rather than functional tools of diplomacy.
A Dual Budget System
The UN’s peacekeeping budget is separate from its regular budget, which funds core activities like human rights, political affairs, and global development. While the regular budget follows the calendar year, the peacekeeping budget runs from July to June, adding another layer of complexity to financial planning.
With global conflicts rising, humanitarian needs escalating, and faith in multilateralism being tested, the UN’s ability to sustain peacekeeping as a credible tool of global security may rest not only on the budget it approves but on the political will to fund it fully.
Reference
UN Approves $5.4 Billion Peacekeeping Budget Amid Cash Crisis and Global Uncertainty